Climate change is a global problem, and it requires solutions on a global scale. One of those is hiding in plain sight. Our lands provide an untapped opportunity – proven ways of both storing carbon and reducing carbon emissions in the world’s forests, grasslands and wetlands: natural climate solutions.
Natural climate solutions can help address climate change in three ways:
To address climate change, we have to invest in natural climate solutions. Yet a quarter of the world’s governments still do not prioritize them. There is a continuing imbalance in investment in nature-based solutions, which trails financing for renewable energy and energy efficiency by a factor of 10 to 1. This is despite natural climate solutions being cost-effective and having benefits beyond reducing climate change.
Capturing and storing CO2 in our natural systems is essential to addressing climate change. Reducing our reliance on fossil fuels and investing in renewable energy will be critical to decreasing emissions in the long term, but transforming energy systems and infrastructure is a slow process. We need to act now if we hope to limit warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius, and natural climate solutions are already widely available.
Natural climate solutions can deliver large-scale emissions reductions cost-effectively. The UN Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change reports that, by 2030, up to a third of its annual land-based emissions reductions targets could be achieved at a cost of $20 or less per carbon tonne. While the transition to low carbon energy will take decades, natural climate solutions could, and we argue should, provide a biological bridge to a low-carbon future in the near-term.
We know that harnessing the power of natural climate solutions to improve decisions related to land use can provide at least 30% of what is needed to keep climate change under 2 degrees C. TNC scientists and economists are working on new assessments that provide more detail about what land can do for people and nature. Stay tuned.
Around the world, huge swaths of temperate and tropical forests have been cleared for human activity. Many of those lands are being used productively to grow food that we need – and, with even better practices, can sustainably yield even more food. Yet many other deforested lands are degraded, and are good candidates for reforestation. Research tells us that reforestation is the single largest nature-based climate mitigation opportunity we have. In addition, reforestation provides cleaner water, cleaner air, flood control, and more fertile soils, not to mention wood products and tree crops.
Of the millions of hectares of land that have been deforested, much of it provides little or no food production, but would provide good opportunities for cost-effective reforestation. Reforesting these lands would sequester billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide without disrupting food production. In some cases, reforestation can be inexpensive and as simple as refraining from burning marginal grazing land, allowing forests to regenerate naturally. In other cases, reforestation can require active planting of trees and then long term care as they grow, and can be a relatively expensive form of land-based sequestration.
One way to unlock this opportunity, is to create the financial incentives to plant trees – billions of them – and to create new markets for more sustainable timber and forest products. Trees deliver a remarkable range of products, including food, building materials, paper products, and fuel.
However, simply creating more markets for wood and forest products is not the answer as this could create incentives for further deforestation. Conservation of unique habitats around the world remains a critical strategy to protect standing forests. What is required is a combination of avoiding further deforestation in critical locations, reforesting on degraded lands, and encouraging more sustainable production in timber plantations and logging concessions.
Aside from the forestry sector, many other sectors can benefit from large-scale tree planting. These include:
Can we be the first generation – since we first tilled the soil more than 10,000 years ago – to regreen the planet?
The Nature Conservancy and its partners are working to unleash the same zeal that promoted growth in the renewable energy sector to also stimulate a new wave of reforestation.
In Brazil’s Pará region, small-scale farmers and ranchers have begun substituting their former crops and cattle ranching for cocoa agroforestry. The Pará region contains at least 1.26 million hectares of deforested areas that have naturally high-fertility soils and are suitable for cocoa production.
Cocoa is in short supply worldwide, making it an attractive crop that can increase family incomes for small farms. Restoring forests with cocoa trees increases carbon storage, increases biodiversity and helps maintain soil fertility. To that end, the Nature Conservancy is working with local farmers in Pará to help with landscape planning and teach responsible agroforestry practices and cocoa cultivation.
A wide variety of opportunities for forest restoration exist around the world, ranging from natural regeneration, to enrichment planting, to high-yield timber plantations. Opportunities occur in most countries, including both large countries like Brazil, India, and the United States, and many smaller countries like Panama, Ecuador, and Benin.
Every year, millions of hectares of native forests are cleared for other land uses, including urban development, croplands, grazing lands and tree plantations. In the process, most of the organic carbon stored in the trees is lost to the atmosphere.
Most deforestation is driven by commercial agriculture; there are lots of opportunities to improve production on existing agricultural lands, so that we can avoid unsustainable forest conversion. Forest protection is particularly important in the tropics, which have the highest rates of forest loss.
Each year, more than 7 million hectares of forest are lost – an area larger than Sierra Leone. Avoiding most of that deforestation would prevent the release many millions of tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per year (GtCO2e/year).
The major challenges to preventing deforestation are political and economic. Avoiding deforestation will require establishing large-scale incentives and regulatory mechanisms to address the major sources of deforestation, such as cattle ranching in the Amazon or palm oil production in Indonesia.
Also, rural communities that depend on unsustainable forest clearing will need help in developing alternative livelihoods. Focusing on single regions will not be enough, however. When forest loss is averted in one region, it is often “transplanted” to another part of the world. To prevent deforestation, we must take an integrated, global approach.
Avoiding forest conversion is a relatively low-cost pathway that’s ready to be put into practice immediately. In the past, critics have argued that it was premature to take action given the limitations of measuring and monitoring the world’s forests. As measurement and monitoring techniques have improved, this argument is no longer a significant barrier to action. Despite some political and economic hurdles, we have the tools we need to stop deforestation now.
First created in 1965, Brazil’s Forest Code was transformed in the 1990s through Presidential decrees and revised again in 2012. The Code regulates land use on private property – and with 53% of Brazil’s native vegetation occurring on private properties, the law goes a long way toward protecting the nation’s native forests.
Since 2001, the Code has required landowners to conserve native vegetation on their rural properties. The 2012 update introduced new mechanisms for protecting land, one of which creates a marketplace for swapping lands that can be legally deforested on one property to offset reforestation requirements on another.
Although the law has been controversial and challenging to enforce, it has achieved important outcomes in slowing forest loss and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Gross tree cover loss in Brazil dropped from 3.84 million hectares per year in 2004 to 2.25 million hectares per year in 2014. Correspondingly, gross carbon emissions fell from 289 million metric tons of carbon per year in 2004 to 152 million metric tons per year in 2014.
The reduction in deforestation is notable, since the 21st century has seen increasing forest loss elsewhere across the tropics. Brazil’s success is thanks to leadership in monitoring and reporting of forest loss. Brazil is the only country in the world that publishes a map of deforestation each year.
Many of the world’s natural forests provide wood products critical to people’s lives and livelihoods. Halting all logging in forests would achieve maximum carbon sequestration, but an end to logging is neither realistic nor necessary.
Improving forest management practices allows natural forests to store more carbon while maintaining wood production for the long term. Logging should certainly be halted in some sensitive places, but the lost production can be made up by new wood production in reforested lands and plantations.
Extending harvest cycles, for example, allows trees to grow more before they’re felled, increasing the average carbon stock across a working forest. Reduced-impact logging practices like cable winching can avoid damage to unharvested trees. And competing vegetation, such as vines, can be thinned to allow trees to grow faster and bigger. Implementing such techniques can allow working forests to sequester more carbon.
Improved natural forest management practices could be applied in some form to some 1.9 billion hectares of wood-production forest worldwide, an area twice the size of the United States.
Timber plantations are found across the globe, accounting for 7% of the world’s total forest area, yet more than a third of the world’s timber production. Plantations are typically managed on shortened harvest rotation lengths that optimize investment returns, rather than longer rotations that deliver broader economic and environmental benefits.
Extending harvest rotation cycles allows trees to absorb more carbon from the atmosphere, while increasing timber yields. Extending harvest cycles to increase carbon uptake in timber plantations would sequester hundreds of millions of tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year (MtCO2e/year).
Around the world, 2.8 billion people burn wood or wood-based charcoal for their basic energy needs. The majority of that fuelwood is used for cooking in developing countries.
Improving cook stoves to burn more efficiently would reduce the amount of wood taken from forests, leaving more carbon in trees. Compared to open fires, modern stoves save up to 70% of fuelwood. In addition, improved cook stoves would reduce smoke inhalation, providing significant health benefits, especially for women and young children.
The challenges of reducing fuelwood harvest are mostly logistical. There can be cultural barriers to convincing people to change the way they cook. Switching to clean cook stoves and alternative fuels, such as gas, can have high upfront costs for homeowners. Further, distributing new technology to remote villages can be difficult. Due to these limitations, this is a comparatively high-cost pathway.
The Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves is working to strengthen the market for clean cookstoves and fuels in Bangladesh, China, Ghana, Guatemala, India, Kenya, Nigeria and Uganda.
Forest and savanna fires release large amounts of carbon into the atmosphere in a short amount of time. Better managing how and when forest and savanna burns can prevent excessive loss of carbon into the atmosphere, through:
Conservationists must consider that prescribed fires will involve increased initial emissions in order to avoid future larger emissions. Implementing prescribed fires and fire breaks will require an initial investment of upfront capital. And because fire management is not a one-time intervention, there are reoccurring costs. Improved fire management practices will be particularly important in African savanna ecosystems and the frontier forests of the Brazilian Amazon.
When synthetic fertilizers are applied to croplands, excess nitrogen is released to the atmosphere or carried away by water. That nitrogen is emitted into the air in the form of nitrous oxide, a greenhouse gas 300 times more potent than carbon.
Cropland nutrient management ensures that the amount of nitrogen applied to the field does not exceed the amount that the plants can absorb. It also ensures fertilizer application is timed to avoid unnecessary runoff and reapplication.
Realizing the full potential for cropland nutrient management would require the adoption of best practices and efficient nutrient management in agricultural systems across the globe.
The main challenge is disseminating information to farmers and encouraging them to implement best practices. Another is the existence of policies designed to stimulate agricultural production, that actively subsidize the overuse of fertilizer. In such cases, policy changes will be necessary to reduce fertilizer use.
To maximize the potential of cropland nutrient management, the farmers around the world would need to adopt standards practiced in North American and Western European agriculture where appropriate. A large improvement could be realized, for example, simply by disseminating information about best practices among regions such as East Asia, where fertilizer use is unnecessarily high. More efficient use of fertilizer can reduce a farmer’s costs without reducing productivity.
In the future, further improvements could come from precision agriculture technologies and the use of alternative forms of fertilizer.
When bare soil is exposed between crops, carbon stored in the soil is lost to the atmosphere. By planting cover crops on croplands that have an off-season fallow period, farmers can expand the length of time that photosynthesis occurs on cropland. This practice, also known as conservation agriculture, increases the amount of carbon stored in the soil, while also improving soil quality and fertility.
Cover crops aren’t suitable everywhere: some areas in the tropics are already double-cropped, and other regions may not have the right conditions to support a second crop. However, about 400 million hectares – up to 25% of the world’s cropland – could be planted with cover crops. That’s an area six times the size of Texas.
Cover crops have the potential to improve soil fertility, increase yields and retain soil moisture to mitigate the effects of drought. One of the challenges to conservation agriculture is disseminating knowledge to farmers about what type of cover crop or crop mixture to plant, when to plant, how deeply to plant and, in some cases, what new equipment might be necessary.
Already, many farming and conservation groups are actively educating farmers about the use of cover crops, but more effort will be needed to spread that knowledge to growers around the world.
As populations grow and the demand for food increases, grasslands and shrub lands around the world continue to be cleared for agriculture. When natural grasslands are tilled for planting, nearly half of the carbon stored in the soil surface is lost to the atmosphere.
Globally, roughly 1.7 million hectares of natural grasslands and shrub lands per year are converted for crops or other uses – an area slightly larger than Connecticut or Kuwait. In the United States, 77% of land converted to croplands between 2008 and 2012 was from grasslands. Agriculture is also crowding into grasslands in East Africa and West Africa.
Feeding our growing population remains a significant challenge. To avoid the conversion of grasslands, we must improve management of the world’s existing croplands and continue efforts to intensify sustainable agriculture on those lands. Due to the high demand for arable land, avoided grassland conversion is a relatively high-cost pathway.
There are many different agricultural practices that incorporate trees into existing cropping systems, and some form of these practices could be beneficial across a large share of cropland globally. One of the main challenges lies in communicating the benefits to farmers, and providing them with the technical support and services to encourage them to shift to a new (sometimes counterintuitive) method of farming.
Agricultural policies and incentives may need to be changed or created to promote the adoption of agroforestry systems. Many different agroforestry systems have been demonstrated to be valuable in different contexts. Three systems used increasingly in croplands include:
Most of the world’s rice is grown in fields that are flooded year-round. When rice is harvested, most of the remaining plant material is left in the ponds, where it sinks to the bottom and begins to decay. Plants that decay in that low-oxygen environment generate methane, a powerful greenhouse gas.
Rice cultivation can be improved by alternately wetting and drying rice fields, or by draining flooded rice fields once during the mid-season. Such methods reduce the time that decaying plant material is submerged, thereby reducing methane emissions. Worldwide, rice is grown on around 192 million hectares (an area nearly the size of Mexico) the vast majority of it in Asia.
However, in many Asian countries, farmers lack the technical capacity to remove water from their fields during the rainy season. They also have little incentive to improve their water management practices.
In a best-case scenario, water management of rice fields can reduce methane emissions by as much as 90% compared to full flooding. And field experiments show that the practice maintains, and in some cases improves, rice yields. Further, many of the world’s rice-producing regions have water shortages, making water management an attractive option for farmers.
In some regions, improved rice cultivation will be expensive to implement. But in others, it would be a relatively low-cost effort. In locations such as India, the southern United States and parts of the Philippines, where farmers irrigate by pumping groundwater, the ability to engage in water management already exists. Doing so could save fuel costs related to operating the pumps.
In areas with the technological capacity, improved rice cultivation could be implemented immediately. In some areas, incentives such as subsidies might be necessary to improve rice production on a broader scale.
Livestock are a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions, but improved efficiency can help to curb those emissions. Reducing the total number of livestock needed to meet the demand for meat and dairy products will reduce the amount of carbon released from cattle farming and ranching without affecting market supply. Beef is the most carbon intensive source of protein on the planet.
Over time, measures designed to encourage dietary change can be used as an emissions reduction strategy: for example, incentivizing people to switch to poultry, fish or beans as sources of protein. However, as the world population continues to grow, it safe to assume that demand for beef and dairy will remain constant in the near term even as people do make dietary changes in certain geographies.
Good animal management techniques include choosing improved livestock breeds, and promoting increased reproductive performance, lower mortality and increased weight gains.
Improved livestock management practices could be applied to a large portion of the 1.4 billion head of cattle worldwide. By implementing these animal management techniques, livestock will feed growing populations more efficiently.
Economic barriers and capital costs can make it difficult for ranchers to purchase new livestock breeds and change other existing management practices. Despite the hurdles, more efficient processes often provide economic benefit to the ranchers.
Many ranchers are already applying animal management strategies such as using breeds that gain weight rapidly or using reproductive management practices that yield high conception rates. Such techniques are available now and are ready for wider implementation.
Livestock release methane as a byproduct of digestion. Methane is approximately 34 times more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. That released from animal digestion (known as enteric methane) is a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions around the world.
Improvements in livestock feed could be applied to a significant number of the more than one billion head of cattle around the world. Feeding animals energy-rich, easily digestible cereal grains can reduce the amount of methane that’s released.
One of the main challenges to improving livestock feed is to tailor new practices related to feed quality to local conditions. This involves issues related to feed availability and economic returns.
Planting legumes such as alfalfa, clover, peas or beans in managed pastures provides increased forage for cattle and other livestock, while also adding carbon to the soil. Legumes are also notable for their ability to fix nitrogen in the soil, reducing the need for the addition of nitrogen fertilizer.
Compared to other grazing practices, planting legumes in pastures has a more limited geographic potential, because it only applies to planted pastures that have a relatively low abundance of legumes to start with. However, there are no major challenges to implementing more widespread planting and legumes could be planted in pastures across 72 million hectares globally, an area about twice the size of Japan. Many ranchers already over-seed their pastures with legumes to improve forage and productivity.
Intensive grazing on grasslands reduces the productivity of plants and reduces the amount of carbon stored in the soil. Optimizing the intensity of grazing reduces carbon loss to the atmosphere.
Ranchers can optimize grazing through methods such as rotational grazing (which involves local monitoring of livestock movements and grazing patterns to allow grass to recover) and bunched grazing (in which livestock are tightly concentrated in an area for a set period of time, then moved on to let the land recover).
Changing grazing management practices is an intervention that could apply to 470 million hectares of rangeland worldwide – an area about half the size of Canada. Such practices are not only beneficial for carbon storage, but also increase profits for ranchers, reduce soil erosion and improve wildlife habitat. Implementing this approach around the world will also require educating ranchers about improved practices and the economic benefits they can offer. Many ranchers are already using these practices to maximize productivity on their rangelands.
Coastal wetlands, also known as ‘blue carbon’ ecosystems, include mangroves, tidal salt marshes and seagrass meadows. There are 13.8 million hectares of mangroves, but there are still gaps in the data for mapping the extent of salt marshes and seagrasses: the estimated total cover of these three ecosystems is between 35 and 120 million hectares globally – less than 1% of the world’s total land area.
Seagrass beds, mangroves and tidal marshes store large amounts of carbon. They draw in carbon as they grow, and much of this is later transferred into the rich organic soils held by their roots. The carbon can remain in the soil for thousands of years, making it one of the longest-term climate mitigation solutions.
Globally, coastal wetlands are found on well over 35 million hectares (an area nearly the size of the Republic of Congo) to perhaps as many as 115 million hectares. Much of those wetlands are degraded and in need of restoration. Coastal wetlands such as mangroves, tidal marshes, or seagrass beds can be restored by reducing pollution, replanting lost vegetation and/or by repairing the natural flow of water.
Efforts to restore mangroves, salt marshes and seagrasses are already underway in many parts of the world, and there are large areas, particularly of abandoned or unproductive aquaculture where restoration would yield rapid returns in both carbon and co-benefits.
Restoring wetlands can be straightforward from a technical point of view. Mangroves, for instance, are easily planted, but in many cases restoring the hydrology alone is all that is needed to allow natural recolonization. But the opportunity cost for such restoration is sometimes high where former wetlands are now developed, or used in productive aquaculture.
Re-establishing coastal wetlands can be a relatively high-cost pathway although it varies according to ecosystem and geography. For example, mangrove restoration in developing countries is low cost compared to tidal marsh restoration in the US. In future, mangrove restoration is likely to be most important in areas that have experienced high rates of loss, including South Central America and East Asia.
Seagrass restoration is largely dependent on improving on-shore watershed and nutrient management practices. Such management policies can be expensive and often take many years to implement fully.
For salt marshes, there is great restoration potential in the U.S., which contains more than 30% of the world’s salt marshes.
A common challenge comes from obscure land tenure, which has greatly hindered some efforts to determine ownership or to undertake restoration in appropriate locations relative to the tidal cycle.
Around the globe, many coastal wetlands are converted for agriculture, aquaculture or urban development.
The loss of healthy wetlands releases stored carbon into the atmosphere. Polluted run-off can also degrade the health of wetlands, leading to an eventual release of carbon trapped in the soil.
Avoiding coastal wetland conversion is a low-cost climate mitigation pathway. Many interventions (such as establishing protected areas, improving land tenure and enforcing land-use laws) can be put into place immediately. Preventing conversion and maintaining the health of coastal wetlands will allow these areas to continue storing and absorbing carbon from the atmosphere.
However, the rate at which salt marshes and seagrass beds are being lost is uncertain. In particular, much more work is needed to map the locations and size of seagrass beds and salt marshes globally. National level maps do exist in a lot of places but there are gaps such as parts of Africa, Asia and South America.
In the US, for example, many states have enacted laws to protect tidal marshes. In Florida, the Mangrove Trimming and Preservation Act protects mangroves on uninhabited islands that are publicly owned or on lands set aside for conservation and preservation. Similar laws could be established to protect coastal wetlands around the world.
In Southeast Asia, meanwhile, where mangrove forests are converted for aquaculture, palm oil production and rice farms, new regulations and viable economic alternatives will be necessary to curb wetland loss.
Peatlands are rare, covering only about 3% of the Earth’s surface. They are defined by soils that are continuously or seasonally saturated with water. The waterlogged soils prevent the breakdown of leaves, wood, roots and other organic material in the soil, allowing carbon to stay trapped underground. In some regions, peat soils are many meters thick and thousands of years old.
Peatlands may be drained and converted to agricultural land or palm plantations. When peatlands are damaged, their stored carbon is lost to the atmosphere. Often the drained peatlands are burned, further amplifying their carbon emissions. Preventing peatland damage will help to keep large amounts of carbon sequestered in the soil.
Peatlands also provide important habitat for many species. Peatlands in Indonesia, for instance, provide prime habitat for orangutans.
Peatlands are considered degraded when they’ve been drained or subjected to altered water flow but have not been completely converted for other land uses. In this degraded state, the carbon stored in plant material buried in peat soil is released into the atmosphere. Dried peat is also susceptible to ground fires, releasing large amounts of stored carbon in short order.
Degraded peatlands are responsible for a large portion of carbon emissions from natural systems. Peat soils can be restored, however, to prevent the further breakdown of stored plant material and to capture new plant debris from vegetation growing aboveground. The primary method of restoration involves “re-wetting,” or restoring the natural flow of water and soil saturation.
The primary challenge to peatland restoration is economic. Altering drainage patterns and local hydrogeography can be costly. Despite the economic hurdles, the technical capacity for restoring peatlands already exists and could be implemented immediately, especially in lower-cost regions. Restoration efforts will also have important benefits for biodiversity.
The biggest challenge to avoiding peatland conversion is monitoring and enforcement. Indonesia, for instance, is a hotspot of peatland conversion. But while there are regulations in place to protect peatlands, experience shows that they are frequently not enforced.
Nature – our best climate technology?
The best climate technology is already deployed on a global scale, having been refined by nature for more than 350 million years.
Green bonds reach record highs
Last year was a big year for green bonds. Apple issued the largest green bond by a U.S. technology company, Poland issued the world’s first sovereign green bond and total green bond issuances grew to a record high.
Maximizing Nature’s Role in Solving Climate Change
Tackling climate change isn’t just about changing how we produce and use energy. We must also maximize nature’s role.
Forest Carbon Science
Stay informed about the latest in climate change science on Cool Green Science.
This Decade’s Most Important Climate Solution
Read about how nature-based solutions are an essential piece of the climate puzzle. And nature’s time is now.
Mapping Ocean Wealth
Learn more about how our oceans and wetlands can help store carbon.
The Next Agriculture Revolution is Under Our Feet
We need to support innovation in soil health to meet the growing demand for food while strengthening the health of our communities, land, water and climate.
Not All Forestry is Carbon Equal
Learn about how forests clean our air, enhance water security and serve as the world’s oldest and most proven carbon storage technology.
The Forgotten Climate Solution
The land sector has the potential to deliver at least 20% of the climate solution.
Seeing the Forest for the Trees
See how we are helping loggers in the Berau District make changes that yield healthier local villagers and more intact forests sequestering carbon.
Scientists hope wetland carbon storage experiment is everyone’s cup of tea
Citizen scientists are being sought for a project which will see tens of thousands of teabags buried in wetlands to monitor carbon sequestration.
Seeing the forest for the trees
Beyond emissions, forests and the natural capital within them — water, air and biodiversity, provide environmental services that support the air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat.
Intact forest landscapes matter for climate change
World Resources Institute researchers share three reasons why protecting intact forest landscapes is crucial to the climate fight.
Carbon farming is pathway to climate stabilization and resilient soils
Through the adoption of smart carbon farming practices, an acre of land could store anywhere from 10 to 100 tons or more of carbon, which can help both mitigate climate change and improve crop yields.
Collaboration to explore ways of working with natural systems to address climate change
Conservation International announce collaboration on climate adaptation and mitigation.
This website, produced by The Nature Conservancy, is aimed at promoting the role of natural-based solutions in tackling climate change. It builds on the work of decades of study in land use by organizations too numerous to mention. Particular thanks for this first release goes to: James Madison University, Woods Hole Research Center, The Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, TerraCarbon, Cornell University, Resources for the Future, Colorado State University, World Resources Institute, the University of Minnesota, the University of Florida, Wetlands International, the University of Vermont, Vivid Economics and Poyry. Generous funding has been provided by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation and the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation.
Copyright © 2021 The Nature Conservancy. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Charitable Solicitation Disclosures
The Nature Conservancy is a nonprofit, tax-exempt charitable organization (tax identification number 53-0242652) under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Donations are tax-deductible as allowed by law.